The Proeger Family · Generation 5 — Earl's great-great-grandparents and their siblings

Robert B. Martin

Probable son of Peter Hines Martin

Robert B. Martin

Probable

Probable son of Peter Hines Martin

Married
Urilda P. Morgan
Sources
7

Research status

Research status: PROBABLE — added to this record 24 September 2026; on the family tree, labelled probable there too. He is named in Peter H. Martin's 1849 will S172 in a gift “for the benefit of my children”, but the will does not say “son”; a census household or a guardianship or estate record naming him as a son would confirm it. The will also records his $370 advance and his share in the shoe store

Evidence: Peter H. Martin's 1849 will, a gift “for the benefit of my children”. The 1870 Shreveport census (S1046) has D. B. Martin, 37, a Tennessee-born merchant, with the same make-up as the 1860 Rusk household (S429). Weak or missing: The will never says “son”; no census or estate record names him as one. The 1870 ages run two to three years young, and nothing on that page names Peter H. Martin, so David B. as Robert's brother is not proven. Not yet confirmed. Know more? Confirm or correct this →

Life in the order the records give it

Record1848
🆕 A Robt. B. Martin was appointed postmaster at Gallatin on 20 April 1848 and held the office until August 1849. The page does not say he is the Robert B. of the will S432. In 1850 Robert B. Martin, 23, was a merchant in Sumner County with Urilda, 21, and their son Charles H., 4 months S428. Between about 1852 and 1854 the family moved to Rusk, Cherokee County, Texas. In 1860 he farmed there, and a D. B. Martin, 29, merchant, born Tennessee, lived next door S429. In 1870 he was a merchant in Rusk with Urilda P., Charlie H., Jennie B., Clarra B. and Percy S430. By 1880 he was a widower, 53, farming in Rusk with his sons Charles H., a schoolteacher, and Percy. He gave his father's birthplace as Virginia and his mother's as Tennessee, which matches Peter Hines Martin and Jane Bell. He is still Probable, because no record names his parents S431. added 25 September 2026.
Census1870
🆕 By 1870 the D. B. Martin of the 1860 Rusk household was a merchant at Shreveport, Caddo Parish, Louisiana, 37, with S. N., Ella and Clarance Probable confirm or correct → S1046. Evidence: the same Tennessee-born merchant, North Carolina-born wife and Texas-born Ella as 1860. Weak: the ages run 2–3 years young, and nothing names Peter H. Martin, so David B. as Robert’s brother stays Probable. Know more? Use “Add to this record”. added 29 September 2026

Family parents, marriages, children, siblings

Marriage1849
Married Urilda P. Morgan, 4 September 1849, Sumner County, Tennessee
two months after Peter's death

Open questions what is probable, weak or missing — confirm or correct it

Probable
Probable son of Peter Hines Martin and Jane Bell; brother of Joseph Daniel Martin

Robert B. Martin · Sources

Citations

Sources cited on this card

7 of the record's sources are cited here. The numbering is the record's own; the full list, with where else each is cited, is at Sources.

  1. S172The last will and testament of Peter H. Martin — Sumner County, Tennessee, written in his own hand 30 June 1849, proved August Term 1849. Tennessee, U.S., Wills and Probate Records, 1779–2008; Sumner County Will Books 1789–1904; Ancestry record 3819223, image 004776071_00479. Read from the image at full resolution, 22 September 2026. "I Peter H. Martin of the County of Sumner and State of Tennessee, being in my usual health and of sound and disposing mind, do make and ordain this my last will and Testament." To his wife Jane Martin, for life: the home plantation, the timbered tract bought of William Walton, the horses Charley and Rhoda and choice of three more, eight cattle, the farm gear, a year's provisions, the household furniture, twenty stock hogs, and "Choice of my Servants to the Number of three." The residue "to be sold at public sale for the benefit of my children." "My Town property to be Sold at a Credit for the benefit of my Children. Robert B. Martin has had an advance of three hundred & seventy dollars for which he will account to the other children in the division of my estate … The Shoe Store may be sold to the Crutchers & R. B. Martin and the latter allowed to retain the use of the Capital I put in." "To David B. Martin I give … a dark bay filly four years old. To Joseph D Martin I give unto a light bay filly now two years old." "To Mr. Wm Bell I leave a house and a support with his Sister as long as he Shall choose to accept it." "Witness that I have written with my own hand this 30th day of June 1849 … P. H. Martin (Seal)." Witnesses Thomas Crutcher, J. B. Wilson, W. H. Crutcher; proved in open court, Sumner County Court, August Term 1849, on the oaths of Thomas Crutcher and Wm H Crutcher; recorded by Wm S. Munday, Clerk. 🔑 This is the document the line page named as the one that would close the Joseph question [S107] — and it had never been read. 🔑 Joseph D Martin is named by his father, inside the passage disposing of the estate for the benefit of my children, in the same breath as David B. Martin and immediately after Robert B. Martin is told to account to the other children in the division of my estate. Three named Martins stand inside the class "my children" in the testator's own instrument. ⚠ The caveat travels with it: the will never writes the word son beside any of the three names. The filiation is carried by the structure of the bequest, not by a kinship term. It is far stronger than the two census households the link rested on [S98] [S161], and it is still not the word. 🔑 William Bell was Jane's BROTHER — with his Sister, in Peter's hand. S98's open brother or uncle is answered, and it explains why he was living in her house in 1850: her husband provided for it. 🔑 Peter Hines Martin kept a SHOE STORE, with capital still in it in 1849 and partners in the Crutchers, and held town property apart from the plantation. Read with Persons engaged in Manufactures: 4 at Gallatin in 1820 [S163], it is one trade across thirty years — and David, 19, "Clerk" in 1850 [S98] was clerking in his father's store. 🔑 Holographic, and four days before his death — written 30 June 1849, and his grave gives 4 July 1849 [S105]. 🔑 Nine people in an instrument Ancestry indexes under one name: Jane Martin, Robert B., David B. and Joseph D Martin, Wm Bell, William Walton, and three witnesses. ⚠ Ancestry's Probate Date 30 Jun 1849 is the date the will was written and sealed; probate is the August Term. ⚠ The will bequeaths Servants by choice of three; it names none of them.
  2. S4281850 U.S. Federal Census — Robert B. Martin household, District 5, Sumner County, Tennessee (dwelling 463, lines 31–34). Ancestry record 6857995. Image examined, read 24 September 2026. Confirmed Robert B. Martin, 23, merchant, real estate $1,500, born Tennessee; Urilda, 21; Charles H., 4 months; and Howel Webb, 16, clerk; enumerated 30 September 1850. Ancestry's index reads the wife as “Milda”; the image, and the later censuses, give Urilda. The page names no parents.
  3. S4291860 U.S. Federal Census — R. B. Martin household, Beat 2, Cherokee County, Texas, P.O. Rusk (dwellings 426–427). Ancestry record 34989871. Image examined, read 24 September 2026. Confirmed R. B. Martin, 33, farmer, real estate $3,000, personal $6,000, born Tennessee; U. P., 30; Charles H., 10, and Jennie B., 8, both born Tennessee; Laura B.(?), 6, born Texas; enumerated 26 June 1860. Next door: D. B. Martin, 29, merchant, born Tennessee, with S[usa]n W., 23, born North Carolina, and Ella, 1 month. The page states no relationship between the two households. The children's birthplaces put the move from Tennessee to Texas between about 1852 and 1854.
  4. S4301870 U.S. Federal Census — Robert B. Martin household, Rusk, Cherokee County, Texas (page 6, dwelling 32, lines 10–17). Ancestry record 5079851. Image examined, read 24 September 2026. Confirmed Robert B. Martin, 43, merchant, real estate $2,000, personal $2,500, born Tennessee; Urilda P., 41; Charlie H., 19, and Jennie B., 17, born Tennessee; Clarra B., 10, and Percy, 6, born Texas; with Jennie Hicks, 22, a domestic servant, and George, 1; enumerated 12 July 1870.
  5. S4311880 U.S. Federal Census — R. B. Martin household, East Half of Rusk, Cherokee County, Texas (ED 12, page 4, lines 12–14). Ancestry record 7324308. Image examined, read 24 September 2026. Confirmed R. B. Martin, 53, widowed, farmer, born Tennessee, father born Virginia, mother born Tennessee; sons Charles H., 30, schoolteacher, born Tennessee, and Percy, 16, born Texas; enumerated 3–4 June 1880. The parents' birthplaces match Peter Hines Martin (born Virginia) and Jane Bell (born Tennessee). That is consistent with his being their son, but it is not proof, and he stays Probable.
  6. S432U.S., Appointments of U. S. Postmasters, vol. 14 (1842–1858), ff. 488–489 — Gallatin (court house), Sumner County, Tennessee. Ancestry record 747676. Image examined, read 24 September 2026. Probable Postmasters at Gallatin: Thomas C. Moore, 30 April 1841; Robt. B. Martin, 20 April 1848; Jno. H. Malone, 16 August 1849; Wm. Menefee, 26 December 1850. The page gives only a name, a town and a date. That this is the Robert B. of Peter H. Martin's will is a reading of place and time, not a stated fact: his successor was appointed six weeks after Peter died at Gallatin.
  7. S10461870 United States Federal Census — Ward 4, Shreveport, Caddo Parish, Louisiana, page 12, dwelling 514. Ancestry record 30599178. Image examined in the Stage 2 reading, 29 September 2026. Probable 20 June 1870: D. B. Martin, 37, merchant, real estate $5,000, born Tennessee; S. N., 32, born North Carolina; Ella, 7, and Clarance, 5, both born Texas; Henry Winfrey, 34, laborer, born Tennessee. The same family as the 1860 Rusk, Texas household (S429): merchant, Tennessee-born, a North Carolina-born wife S., a daughter Ella. Weak: every age here runs 2–3 years young against 1860 and 1880, and nothing on the page names Peter H. Martin or Sumner County.

Know something this page doesn't? Send it to Earl — corrections, names, dates, documents. Nothing appears here until he has reviewed it.

Compiled for the Proeger family

Living adults appear by name and relationship, with the year only: no full date of birth and no home town on any page that search engines index, and a living person’s own page is kept out of search engines. Minors appear by name only — no date of birth, no birth year, no age, no school, no place, no address, no other identifying detail. A minor may be named and may appear in a family photograph; nothing further about them is published. Where it is not established whether someone is an adult or a minor, the minor rule applies.

Know something this record doesn't? Send it to Earl.

Top