On this page
Whose family are you here for?
Showing both families — every line on the page. Pick a side to hide the other
family's ancestors; Earl, Kristin and their three children stay on either way.
Documents · Documents
How to read this record
Every claim is tagged
Most family trees flatten everything into the same confident typeface. This one does not.
The three research tags below are the whole point of the exercise: they say what a document
proves, what the weight of evidence suggests, and what nobody has found yet. A fourth marks
what the family stated directly, where no document has been retrieved at all — it is kept
separate on purpose and is never quietly promoted to confirmed. A fifth marks biological evidence: a DNA result is not a document, and it is not
testimony either. Two further labels mark where this page withholds information
rather than lacking it.
ConfirmedAttested by a document that was actually retrieved and read — a census sheet, a
government index, a grave marker, a family-written obituary.
ProbableStrongly supported but not nailed down: a user-contributed tree, a masked index field,
or a chain of consistent circumstances. Believable, not proven.
Not foundSearched for and not located. This is a statement about the search, not about the
person — the record may well exist somewhere unsearched.
Family testimonySupplied by the family and recorded on their word — no document has been retrieved for
it. Note the diamond rather than the dot: this is provenance, not proof, and it stands
apart from the three record tags above S24.
DNA evidenceBiological evidence consistent with a claim. It corroborates origins; it does
not by itself establish a person or a link. Note the bar rather than a dot or a diamond:
no DNA result on this page is ever counted as confirmed, because no document
was read for it S46.
Living — withheldThe person is living. On the charts and in the chains of names a living person appears
by name and relationship. A living adult’s full record is on their own card,
published with the family’s consent and kept out of search engines. A minor
appears by name only. The privacy note at the head of the page gives the rule in full.
Research in progressA branch that is actively being worked on. The node exists in the structure so the
shape of the family is honest; the detail is simply not in yet.
← All documents ← Lone Brock →
Schuster — 2 pages
Lendsiedel and Ilshofen marriage registers, Württemberg, 1676 and 1699 — the parents of Elisabetha Schuster, wife of Hans (Johann) Pröger. Both entries are Probable: they match her baptism by name, hamlet and parish.
Documents (2)
OpenHans (Johannes) Gronbach — Württemberg, Lutheran Parish Registers — Lendsiedel marriages 1676 (Ancestry record 914964776, image 1528571-00015) · S805
29 February 1676 · p. 00015
Probable S805
Download ·
→ card
OpenWürttemberg, Lutheran Parish Registers — Ilshofen marriages 1699, 3rd entry (Ancestry record 11969031) · S806
22 August 1699 · p. 3rd entry
Probable S666 S806
Download ·
→ card← All documents ← Lone Brock →